Filmmaker Dean Hyers Tackles Life and Work Questions:
Dear Dean, collaboration is killing me. How can I work better with my partners?
A very good question: Is collaboration working together, or against, your creative partners? When it works, are they really working together at all, or is it nothing more than a segmentation of responsibility where people work independently on items that link together in the end?
Can people actually work and create together? Can a true collaboration without egos exist?
Right now, I've been proudly enduring a grueling summer of successfully frustrating collaborations. Successful because they're working to achieve a higher result, but frustrating because hurt-feelings, bruised egos, defensiveness, and territorialism weigh into the experience about as much as the thrill of the better result.
Today, the results are impressive, yet my batteries are weak because of the amount of energy that's required to collaborate. This issue is affecting SagePresence, my speaking career, my training efforts, and my film projects. I love my partners, but fear my ability to endure.
So I guess I'm writing myself this time. It's me with the question, and I'm going to hold myself to having my own answer. So here goes:
Dear Dean, don't worry. Your feelings are normal, and so are the frustrations your partners are feeling. But you said it yourself – "The results are impressive." Is that not half your answer right there? I hope so, because the tradeoff going the other way is disappointing.
Here's the rest of your answer, and please write me again if this doesn't do it.
The Five Laws of Successful Collaboration:
1) Respect Always: you must actively respect any partners in a collaboration. This means not only that you "theoretically" respect, but that you actively choose to feel the respect in the moment and embody it. If you say you respect, but you harbor resentment and frustration in the process, it won't work.
2) Zones of Responsibility and Input Everywhere Else: My hope in collaboration is that it can really become working together (beyond simply working solo on different aspects of the same project). But zones of higher authority must be established so that team-members are not in competition with each other. If we know our zones, we can have some measure of peace knowing that we have some measure of control, yet we can allow open input on the project as a whole.
3) Listen and Acknowledge First, then Fight the Good Fight Second: What I've observed blowing the lid off the can of collaborative whoop-ass is the launch into the battle before it's time for fighting. Hear your partners out completely, and restate their input, before doing battle with it. Actively understanding first needs to be a pattern. If it's not, the team member least prone to do battle will adopt a prevailing tendency to yield, and their frustrations will build up and explode above and beyond the call of duty.
4) Defend Each Collaborator's Right to Be Heard: In collaboration, you don't have the right to get your way, but you have the right to be heard and understood before you get shot down. Many amazing ideas never materialize because they weren't explored long enough to find their hidden value. Half the time, the contributor hasn't baked the idea long enough to be able to defend it fully, but that doesn't mean the idea won't prove valuable if fully baked.
Each collaborator should police that process and defend the underdog – be constantly on the lookout for a voice being squelched and defend it even if it isn't a perspective you like. You should do that because you believe in the process, but if the high road isn't calling you, do it selfishly – do it because fighting for others' fair consideration will translate into others defending you and your right for fair consideration.
5) Stay True to Yourself: Don't give in to group-think, which doesn't mean you always fight for your way. Collaboration is full of compromise, but so is life, and so is going solo. That said, don't squelch your own voice under peer pressure. Voice your decision to go with the group over yourself on this item, but be honest about your own perspective.
Decide what hill is worth dying on and fight for those items. Never compromise your own voice by pretending to agree when you don't – that will eat you up from the inside. Be honest, voice your truth, and then decide if you will stand your ground or fall in line – it's a choice. It's yours to make and once you make it you have to get behind it even if it is your choice to yield.
Remember: collaboration is a struggle to juggle between the group process you believe in and the mind that does the believing.
The right pattern of being heard and treated respectfully as a contributor will help each individual handle the pressure of collaborating. Even if you're shot down in the end, you will feel part of the process and be able to learn from your collaborative competitors.
Collaboration can exists and be sustained if the we respect, define zones, and listen first.
I have one more piece of wisdom on collaborating: when it gets difficult, there's usually an emotionally charged element of fear or a sense of threat. If it just isn't working, see if you can discuss who feels threatened and why. What is the nature of the threat and what does the person fear will happen if the threat is carried out? You might just be able to resolve or diminish the underlying issue that's causing the tension.
Best,
Abby




